black-and-white thinking, false dichotomy, false dilemma

In the error in logic known as black-and-white thinking, the writer suggests that there are only two (or three) possible options when in fact there is a whole range of positions or choices. (It’s like seeing only in black and white and ignoring the shades of gray in between.)

  • Those who are not with us are against us! [There are more than two possible positions. A person or group could have a neutral stance or could disagree in part with our position without entirely opposing us.]
  • Environmental legislation will lead to job losses, because offending factories will have to be shut down. [Is shutting down factories the only solution to complying with the legislation?]
  • You won’t fund my campaign for the protection of purple-crested warblers? How can you claim to be concerned about the environment? [Are there only two possible positions: on the one hand, willingness to fund a specific campaign; on the other, a total lack of concern for the environment?]

This error in thinking is also known as a false dilemma or a false dichotomy. (A dichotomy is a division of something into two opposing parts.)

Search by related themes

Want to learn more about a theme discussed on this page? Click on a link below to see all the pages on the Language Portal of Canada that relate to the theme you selected. The search results will be displayed in Language Navigator.

Date modified: