by Frances Peck
(Terminology Update, volume 35, number 2, 2002, page 7)
The apostrophe: a punctuation mark used primarily to denote possession. Under-Ease: airtight underwear with a replaceable filter to remove foul gases before they escape. What could these items possibly have in common?
Surprisingly, both captured the spotlight at last year's Ig Nobel Prizes, sponsored by the humour magazine Annals of Improbable Research and presented annually at Harvard to people whose achievements "cannot or should not be reproduced." The 2001 Ig Nobel prize for literature went to British journalist John Richards, founder of the Apostrophe Protection Society, for his efforts to protect, promote and defend the proper use of the apostrophe.
Those of us who respect the English language, and its myriad rules and conventions, may wonder. Why is the unassuming apostrophe the object of such mockery? How can its champion be lumped together with the forces against flatulence?
Apostrophe defenders cannot help but notice that this little mark is in grave trouble. Grocers nowadays promise "fresh tomato's." Computer manuals list "users preferences." Restaurants boast "the best donair's in town." It seems apostrophes are scarce when they're needed, plentiful when they're not.
The apostrophe most commonly shows ownership or possession. There are three basic rules for making nouns possessive:
the children's room
the user's preferences
the tomato's seeds
the mushrooms' stems
the twins' room
the books' jackets
the MacNeils' house
the boss's rules
for goodness' sake
Some constructions are more puzzling than others—multiple ownership, for instance. Generally speaking, if individuals own something together, use the possessive with only the last noun: Suzanne and Jason's apartment, Sonny and Cher's music. If individuals own things separately, use the possessive with each noun: Ian's, Thelma's and Louise's birthdays, the boys' and girls' washrooms.
You may also wonder about the curiously redundant double possessive: that idea of Arnold's, a friend of my father's. Rest assured, this construction is common and entirely acceptable. It usually indicates that the thing possessed is one of several: Arnold has several ideas; my father has several friends.
And beware the seven deadly possessive pronouns, none of which takes an apostrophe: his, hers, theirs, yours, ours, its and whose. The last two plague apostrophe aficionados everywhere, and are responsible for such howlers as the cat licked it's paw (should be its) and who's books are these? (should be whose). Remember that it's and who's are contractions, short forms for it is/it has and who is/who has.
Ig Nobel laureate John Richards verges on apoplectic when warning against the apostrophe with plurals. "Apostrophes are NEVER ever used to denote plurals!" his Web site shrieks. "Common examples of such abuse (all seen in real life!) are: Banana's for sale which of course should read Bananas for sale… " (If only Richards brought the same rigour to the comma, unaccountably absent from the above sentences.)
Sadly, in sounding this alarm, our apostrophe protector goes too far. One cannot quibble with his example, nor with such egregious plurals as donair's and tomato's. But nearly all style guides and authorities agree that certain plurals can (and sometimes should) be formed with 's. The most widely accepted are plurals of symbols, numerals, letters (especially lower-case), abbreviations (especially with periods) and words mentioned as words:
The apostrophe often appears, correctly, in constructions that are only loosely possessive:
Even though these possessives fall outside the category of strict ownership, they can all be translated into an of phrase: the sales of the book, the conclusion of the report, the representative of the group. Remembering this helps with tricky possessives like one week's vacation (a vacation of one week) and two cents' worth (the worth of two cents).
In other cases, the noun may be more descriptive than possessive and may not translate into an of phrase. Here is where apostrophes become devilishly difficult. Two main rules prevail:
a savings bank
a World Series record
a United Nations summit
the appropriations group
a Knicks game
an estimates meeting
In these examples, the nouns ending in s serve as describers rather than possessors. Also, of phrases do not really work with them. Instead, other words are understood: a bank for savings, a summit by/for the United Nations, a game involving the Knicks, etc.
the people's bank
a children's fund
the women's credit union
When it comes to names of organizations, places and other proper nouns, apostrophe use is a mind-bending hodgepodge. You can belong to the Editors' Association of Canada or the Canadian Nurses Association. You can live in St. John's, Newfoundland, or St. Andrews, New Brunswick (where, by the way, you might celebrate St. Andrew's Day each November 30). In Ottawa you can buy groceries at Loblaws or Hartman's, and grab a java at Starbucks or Timothy's. The only sure way through this thicket of contradictions is to check official spellings.
Its idiosyncrasies aside, the apostrophe merits the support offered it by Richards and his Apostrophe Protection Society. And others clearly agree: the Society's Web site has attracted more than 55,400 visitors to date. True, apostrophe rules may not be as airtight as those prize-winning undergarments, but these few principles should put your mind, at least, at ease.